XeHost X512 性能测试

老规矩了,换 VPS 以后要上 UnixBench 。我的这台位于加州二号机房,和 YardVPS 一样托管于 phychz.net 。网速还行,华科教育网半夜可以到 200KB/s ,晚上最繁忙的时候就只有 20KB/s 左右了。目前没有 IPv6 。

XeHost 的 X512 售价为 ¥99/月,使用了 xehost85 优惠码以后为 ¥84.15/月,还算可以。先说下配置吧:

  • 30GB 硬盘空间
  • 500GB 月流量
  • 512MB RAM + 512MB Swap
  • 4 CPU Cores
  • 99% Uptime Monthly

服务器的系统是 Ubuntu 10.10 ,内核为 Linux dword1511.info 2.6.38-13-generic #57-Ubuntu SMP Mon Mar 5 18:29:54 UTC 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux ,很奇怪为何默认没有用 EC2 版本的内核。现在奉上测试结果,单线程几乎到到了 YardVPS 的两倍,四线程就更不谈了,但是似乎浮点性能不如 YardVPS 。

具体如下:

========================================================================
   BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)

   System: dword1511.info: GNU/Linux
   OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.38-13-generic -- #57-Ubuntu SMP Mon Mar 5 18:29:54 UTC 2012
   Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
   Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="ANSI_X3.4-1968", collate="ANSI_X3.4-1968")
   CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz (6385.5 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
   CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz (6385.5 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
   CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz (6385.5 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
   CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz (6385.5 bogomips)
          Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
   14:43:52 up 23:06,  1 user,  load average: 0.13, 0.05, 0.72; runlevel 2

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: 日  3月 25 2012 14:43:52 - 15:11:57
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       35971094.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     3879.8 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               1500.4 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        244176.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           63216.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        802200.3 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              388794.8 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                  67233.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               3269.8 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   4978.2 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1356.7 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         437015.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   35971094.1   3082.4
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       3879.8    705.4
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       1500.4    348.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     244176.5    616.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      63216.0    382.0
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     802200.3   1383.1
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     388794.8    312.5
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      67233.0    168.1
Process Creation                                126.0       3269.8    259.5
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       4978.2   1174.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1356.7   2261.1
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     437015.2    291.3
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         609.1

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: 日  3月 25 2012 15:11:57 - 15:40:05
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables      125844156.5 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                    14912.7 MWIPS (9.9 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               5004.6 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        375820.3 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           98736.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks       1321319.6 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             1441846.1 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 242508.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               9890.6 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                  11155.9 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                   1476.8 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        1574173.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0  125844156.5  10783.6
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0      14912.7   2711.4
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       5004.6   1163.9
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     375820.3    949.0
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      98736.8    596.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0    1321319.6   2278.1
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1441846.1   1159.0
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     242508.4    606.3
Process Creation                                126.0       9890.6    785.0
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4      11155.9   2631.1
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0       1476.8   2461.4
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    1574173.0   1049.4
                                                                   ========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                        1530.0

发表回复

您的电子邮箱地址不会被公开。 必填项已用*标注

此站点使用Akismet来减少垃圾评论。了解我们如何处理您的评论数据